Acoplanarity distributions in KK and PHOTOS

These plots present photon acoplanarity distributions in the
Z->mu mu gamma gamma process.

The following kinematical cuts have been applied: Note that in the plots, "SDP=0" has no meaning!
However, it is striking to see that PHOTOS disagrees with KKMC of order O(alpha^1) matrix element CEEX exponentiated.
Only when second order matrix element in KKMC is present, the agreement with PHOTOS is reasonable.


Pt ordering in PHOTOS.

In principle. each iteration of the kernel for photon emission in PHOTOS is performing exactly the same action. Thus, one could think that photons will be generated in identical, independent way. This is not true, because of Energy-Momentum conservation: the phase space for second (and subsequent) emission is smaller, but also the effect of latter emission change slightly the kinematics of the previous one. There was some freedom of implementing this effect of consecutive kernel actions. This freedom was used to mimic as good as possible distributions of the two-photon matrix-elements. However in 1994 this was not considered to be an important property. We show some "poor-man's" attempt of Shwinger-Dyson - type equation was nonetheless created. This simplification of algorithm to have independent emissions of photons and nonetheless have some pt-ordering is worth mentioning here. Let us continue with plots quantifying this effects.

We start with a general one, where the effect of pt distributions on harder/softer photon because of consecutive generation of previous one is quantified. Because everything is piled-together, only very off-diagonal points are visible. These are events usually with two photons in oposite hemisphere than the emitting charge.

In the plots we use SQRT( 1/2 * (1 - p_|| / E_gamma ) ) variable to represent "effective pt".



Last modified by Piotr Golonka, 7 October 2004, 12:45